Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Guest Post:Financial Markets and Economic Update For Second Quarter 2Q26

I start my newsletter on a sad note this quarter.  On June 22nd, former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan, died at the age of 100.  He served as Fed Chairman from August, 1987 until his term expired at the end of January, 2006.  He was Fed Chairman during my formative years at Meridian Bank in Reading.  He guided us through the crash of 1987, the S&L crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s, the CRE crisis of 1990, the tech stock bubble of 2000-2001, September 11th and subsequent recession, and left his position before the housing crisis grew into the Great Recession of 2008.  I’m still mad at him for raising interest rates so much in 1994.  On the positive side, he guided us to ten consecutive years of GDP growth from 1991 to 2001.  I, like most investors and banking industry professionals, had a love-hate relationship with him.  But to many of us, he will always be the Maestro.

Iran

The Iran conflict (or is it a war?) dominated the headlines and caused turmoil in markets- stocks, bonds, crypto, and commodities- during the 2Q26.  WTI crude prices peaked at $111.50 per barrel in early April, but right before the conflict began at the end of February, crude was at $68; the increase was +64%.  WTI crude is now back down to $70 today.  Gas prices spiked from just below $3.00 per gallon to $4.56 on May 21st, and have fallen back to $3.88 today, for a much slower pace of decline.  Price increases likely would have been much worse had the US not had such high oil capacity.  Earlier episodes of oil price spikes in 1974, 1979, 1991, and 2022 were longer lived and quickly changed from inflation risk to recession risk. 

The primary issue is the danger to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz as Iran fired upon and threatened ships there.  The US set up a blockade so that Iranian oil could not leave the country, pressuring their economy.  While the US does not face oil and gas shortages, many countries do.  Europe imports 95% of its oil, China 75%, and Japan 99%.

The US is trying to negotiate with Iran and has a fragile 60-day ceasefire, but can we trust this global threat?  They use short- and long-range ballistic missiles and drones to threaten their region and the world.  They threaten ships in the Strait, support terrorists like Hezbollah and Hamas, continue to seek nuclear weapons, and kill thousands of their own people as they did earlier this year.  Can we even trust them to not build a nuclear weapon?  I think not.  Stock markets don’t trust them either, judging from recent volatility.

Change Has Come to the Fed- Finally

Kevin Warsh was sworn in as new Federal Reserve Chairman on May 22nd at the White House (as Greenspan had been in 1987) and a new era began.  Warsh served on the Fed’s Board of Governors previously, from February, 2006 to March, 2011.  Like Greenspan, he believes productivity should be a major factor in monetary policy decisions and that the Fed should not just rely on published data and rules of thumb like the Phillips curve.  Artificial Intelligence right now is expected to lead to another productivity boom, just as the personal computer and the Internet did in the 1990s.  It was no surprise that there was no change in rates at Warsh’s first meeting while he contemplates what to change at the Fed.

Jerome Powell’s term as Chairman expired in May but, like company that doesn’t know when to leave a party, he insisted on staying on the Board of Governors.  It is a highly unusual move and last occurred in 1948, when Fed Chairman, Marriner Eccles, refused to leave the Board when his chairmanship ended despite a request by President Truman to step down.  Why do we give separate Chair and Board terms to these obnoxious people?  On May 31st, Powell received the Profiles in Courage award from the JFK Presidential Library.  For what exactly?

Chairman Warsh is setting up five working groups to review monetary policy and operations, how to communicate to markets and to the public, data sources and potential new ones, productivity and job growth, and inflation measures and targets.  Hopefully he dumps the SEP, or Summary of Economic Projections, because it is often ridiculous, senseless, and more inaccurate than accurate.  (For this quarter, Warsh did not provide any projections; the other 18 FOMC members did).  Does it bother anyone that they project inflation to fall but it always takes two years to get to target?  Does it bother anyone that they project low GDP growth, but don’t project lower rates?

Some of My Favorite Economic Indicators

Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)- Could we be seeing the bottoming and reversal of the nearly four-year negative cycle in the LEI?  May’s index was +.1%, following April’s rise of +.3%.  March was down -.6% likely due to the shock of the Iran conflict, and February rose +.3%.  The index had declined in 39 of the last 47 months.  We’ve seen three increases- all this year and five months of no change in 2024 to 2026.  LEI had signaled recession many times in those 39 months, but like the inverted yield curves of 2022 to 2024, a sustained downturn in GDP never occurred. 

Inflation- The Iran conflict led to a spike in oil prices from $68 to $111.50 in April and we have seen prices fall back in May and June when hopes of an end to the conflict are at their highest.  However, headline and core (ex. food and energy) prices that were trending down toward targets are now uncomfortably high.  CPI for May y-o-y was +4.2% and core was +2.9%.  PCE in May was +4.1% and core was +3.4%.  PPI for May was +6.5% and core was +4.9%.  It feels like 2022-2023 all over again, but the measures are all expected to decline as oil prices and the slower moving gas prices drop back down to pre-conflict levels.  We are still in the unnatural and unprecedented situation where PCE is too close to or greater than CPI;  May PCE of +4.1% is just .1% under CPI of +4.2%.  May core PCE of +3.4% is .50% greater than May core CPI of +2.9%.  CPI is supposed to be .50% higher than PCE in a normal relationship.  I’m currently reviewing the “Truflation” measure, which is a real-time y-o-y estimate for CPI, started in December, 2021.  For you Bloomberg users, the ticker is TRUFUS44.

Real GDP- The Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now is currently at +2.5% for 2Q26.  GDP had improved in 1Q26 to +2.1%, following +.5% in 4Q25.  Nominal GDP was +5.1% in 1Q26, falling from +5.8% in 4Q25. 

Moody’s Beige Book Index- The June, 2026 Beige Book showed a lot of improvement.  Ten districts increased, one was flat, and one declined, which sadly was our own Philadelphia district.  The Moody’s index improved to 36.1 in June, following 25.0 in April, and 16.7 in March.

M2 Money Supply- M2 y-o-y growth was unexpectedly stronger in May at +5.6%, following April +4.7%, March +4.3%, and February +4.3%.  Finally, May’s growth is close to the average nominal GDP growth of +5.5% for 1Q26 and 4Q25.  We saw outright declines from December, 2022 to March, 2024 that were hurtful to growth.  The velocity of money has been flat at 1.41 in 1Q26, 4Q25, and 3Q25.  (Remember GDP=M x V).

Spacex and the Markets

Spacex completed the largest IPO in history on June 12th, priced at $135 per share.  Trading opened at $152.75, hit a trading high of $225 within days, and slowly faded back to $153 on June 26th.  Elon Musk became the first trillionaire with that issuance. The market cap stands at $2.0 trillion.

Spacex isn’t the only stock to rise and then fall back this quarter.  After stocks fell in March and April, prices rallied in May into June, before turning down as we see volatility with Iran and quarter-end repositioning.  The S&P 500 forward PE ratio is about 23 (19 to 24 is typical in a bull market).  AI investment and buildout will take an estimated three to five years and should lead to increased productivity, increased corporate profits, and increased GDP growth, albeit with potential increased job losses.  With the pool of available workers growing steadily and now at 14,063,000, this could spell bad news for the labor market.  Inflation will likely decline in this scenario.  (Warsh knows).

Don’t forget bonds.  They’ve been very volatile with a tendency toward rising rates most of the quarter.  During 2Q26, the 2-year Treasury yield rose 30 basis points to 4.09%, the 5-year Treasury rose 20 basis points to 4.13%, and the 10-year Treasury rose 5 basis points to 4.37% (after peaking at 4.50% with worries about the budget deficit, US debt/GDP at 122.8%, and uncertainty over term premiums).  Mortgage rates remain stubbornly high.  Watch out. The curve is flattening.

World Cup

Soccer fans have taken the US by storm, with an estimated 1 million to 5 million fans visiting the US, Canada, and Mexico for the matches.  Among the favorites are USA with Pulisic, France with MBappe (my personal favorite), Argentina with Messi (the greatest), England with Kane, and Norway with Haaland.  My niece got to go to the Ghana match in Philadelphia yesterday to cheer on her home country.  It has been exciting to watch some of the matches, but the 0-0 ties are a little trying.  It’s truly exciting as foreign visitors are praising the great time they are having in America. 

Large Hadron Collider

CERN has scheduled another long shutdown (LS3) for the LHC starting tomorrow to increase its capacity; this shutdown will last until June, 2030.  Other shutdowns included the September, 2008 one right after the LHC was started up on September 10, 2008, due to electrical issues and helium leaks and coincided with the Great Recession.  A temporary shutdown occurred in November, 2009 when a bird dropped a baguette into the electrical substation.  LS1 was from February, 2013 for two years, and LS2 was from December, 2018 for over three years, coinciding with the covid-19 pandemic.  We will wait for what’s next.  In all these years, I only remember one important discovery, that of the Higgs Boson particle in 2012.  Perhaps they don’t tell us everything.  Why would they keep spending extreme amount of money on the LHC?  Maybe they will someday tell us. 

Italy- Here We Come!!

This summer, we will visit Milan, Lake Como, Florence, Pisa, Tuscany towns of Chianti and San Gimignano, Cinque Terre, and Rome.  We are just praying that the 100+ degree heat wave ends before we go.  We have an excellent Italian travel agent who took care of all details- large and small.  I highly recommend her and if you plan a trip to Italia, let me know and I’ll give you contact information.

The Italian economy is producing just +.5% GDP growth despite its strength in manufacturing.  Unemployment is 5.7%.  Government debt is putting a drag on growth, with the debt/GDP ratio of 133.3%; US growth is also slowed by its ratio of 122.8%.  Prime Minister, Giorgia Meloni, has her hands full trying to improve the economy while navigating the EU rules. 

So, for now, arrivederci!


Thanks for reading!  As always, I appreciate your support!  Viva l’Italia!  DLJ 06/28/26


Dorothy Jaworski has worked at large and small banks for over 30 years; much of that time has been spent in investment portfolio management, risk management, and financial analysis. Dorothy recently retired from Penn Community Bank where she worked since 2004. She is the author of Just Another Good Soldier, and Honoring Stephen Jaworski, which details the 11th Infantry Regiment's WWII crossing of the Moselle River where her uncle, Pfc. Stephen W. Jaworski, gave his last full measure of devotion.


Disclaimer: This publication is provided to you solely for educational and entertainment purposes.  The information contained herein is based on sources believed to be reliable but is not represented to be complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed.  The expressed opinions, views, and estimates are those of the author as of this date and are subject to change without notice.  The author cannot provide investment advice but welcomes your comments.


Saturday, June 27, 2026

What Drives Bank Valuations?

I've been researching what is driving bank stock valuations. It has been a subject that has lived rent free in my head for years. What I would like to drive valuation: long-term EPS growth, financial performance and financial condition. There is correlating factors to these drivers. But I also can't ignore how much tangible book value per share (TBVPS) growth is also a key driver.

Banking is one of the only industries that anchor valuations so heavily to equity. Not just my opinion. A CEO just lamented about this. What makes it troublesome is that retail bank stock investors like a clean balance sheet, good profits, and a strong dividend. Pay a higher dividend and you stunt TBVPS growth. And since this is a valuation driver, you might be slowing share price appreciation. 

You can see this play out with banks that have poor earnings. They trade at relatively high P/EPS multiples versus very profitable banks. It is common to see a very profitable bank trade at less than 10x P/ EPS while a terrible earner trading at 15x-20x. The poor earner might be trading at book, while the good earner at 1.25x book. Telling you all that you need to know about the peculiarities of bank stock valuation. 

To do a deeper dive, I ran a lot of data. I downloaded the following data points for years 2021 - 2026Q1:

TBVPS Growth, EPS Growth, Leverage Ratio, NPAs/Assets, ROAA, ROAE, Net Interest Margin, Cost of Funds, Yield on Earning Assets, Efficiency Ratio, P/EPS, P/TBVPS

I asked Copilot to find correlations between the financial performance and financial condition factors and compare it to investment banks and consulting firms' observations on bank stock valuations. Here are the most salient findings with accompanying tables and charts.

Interesting that Copilot made no correlation to Cost of Funds, even though those publicly traded bank with the lowest cost of funds traded at the highest P/TBVPS, and second highest P/EPS (see table below). Low COF banks trading at higher multiples than higher Yield on Earning Assets banks has been consistent over the 20 years I have made the comparison. 

Here is what Copilot had to say after consuming all of the data and referencing industry experts.

 ✅ A. ROE / ROTCE ↔ P/TBV (strongest positive correlation)

Conclusion:
👉 This is the #1 driver of bank valuation multiples

  • Banks with higher ROE consistently show higher TBV growth and would command higher P/TBV

Supporting evidence:

The dataset implication:

  • ROAE + EPS growth columns will show highest explanatory power for valuation dispersion

✅ B. ROA ↔ Multiples (very strong, often underappreciated)

Conclusion:
👉
ROA drives quality of earnings, and therefore valuation durability

  • Clean ROA → high NIM, low NPAs, strong efficiency
  • High ROA banks don’t rely on leverage → more sustainable

Observed pattern in your data:

  • Banks with:
    • ROAA > ~1.2%
    • Low NPAs
    • Efficiency <55%

→ also show:

  • Strong EPS growth
  • Strong TBVPS compounding

Industry confirmation:

  • ROA reflects true operating performance and asset quality [linkedin.com]
  • Markets reward “clean ROE built on ROA,” not leverage-driven returns [linkedin.com]

✅ C. EPS Growth ↔ P/E (very strong)

Conclusion:
👉
Growth is the primary driver of P/E dispersion

From your dataset:

  • EPS growth volatility is very high across banks
  • High-growth names (especially >15–20%) stand out sharply

Relationship:

  • Higher forward EPS growth → higher justified P/E

Analyst view:


✅ D. TBVPS Growth ↔ P/TBV (structural correlation)

Conclusion: 👉 TBV growth is the long-term anchor of returns

In the dataset:

  • TBVPS growth aligns tightly with:
    • ROE
    • retained earnings
    • efficiency

Banks with steady TBV compounding:

  • Show stable ROE
  • Have better efficiency ratios

✅ E. Asset quality (NPAs) ↔ Multiples (negative correlation)

Conclusion: 👉 One of the strongest negative drivers

From the data:

  • NPAs vary dramatically
  • Higher NPAs → lower ROA → lower ROE → compressed multiples

Industry evidence:


✅ F. Efficiency ratio ↔ Valuation (negative correlation)

Conclusion: 👉 Efficiency drives operating leverage and ROA

From the data:

  • Banks with efficiency <50–55% consistently show:
    • higher ROA
    • better EPS growth

Interpretation:

  • Markets reward cost discipline + operating leverage

✅ G. NIM ↔ ROA ↔ Multiples (moderate–strong chain)

Conclusion: 👉 NIM is an indirect but important driver

From your dataset:

  • Higher NIM → higher ROA → higher ROE → higher valuation

Industry context:

  • NIM compression in 2025 is already affecting profitability expectations [mckinsey.com]

✅ H. Leverage ↔ Multiples (non-linear / weak-to-negative)

  • High leverage can boost ROE
  • But:
    • increases risk
    • lowers valuation quality

The dataset:

  • Shows mixed relationship
  • Supports known reality: markets discount “leveraged ROE”

3) Synthesis: What actually explains bank multiples (ranked)

Tier 1 (dominant drivers)

  1. ROE / ROTCE
  2. EPS growth
  3. TBVPS growth

Tier 2 (core operating drivers)

  1. ROA (asset-level profitability)
  2. Efficiency ratio
  3. NIM

Tier 3 (risk modifiers)

  1. Credit quality (NPAs)
  2. Capital / leverage

4) How this aligns with recent investment-bank / industry commentary

🔹 1. Profitability (ROE) is still the anchor

  • Valuation gaps across banks persist largely due to ROE dispersion
  • Investors reward sustainable ROE above cost of equity [bis.org]

🔹 2. Growth skepticism is suppressing multiples

  • Despite strong 2024–2025 earnings:
    • bank P/B and P/E remain structurally low
  • Investors are questioning long-term growth durability [mckinsey.com]

🔹 3. Markets increasingly distinguish “quality of earnings”

  • Banks are not valued just on ROE:
    • but how ROE is generated
  • Clean ROA + low credit cost outperform leverage-driven models [linkedin.com]

🔹 4. Strategy + credibility now matter more

  • Bain: valuation dispersion driven by:
    • execution consistency
    • growth narrative
    • capital allocation credibility [bain.com]

🔹 5. Structural valuation framework

Investment banks (FIG coverage) consistently anchor:

  • P/TBV ↔ ROE / ROTCE
  • P/E ↔ EPS growth + cyclicality
  • Adjusted for:

5) Bottom line (what the dataset is telling us)

🔴 The single most important takeaway:

👉 ROE (and ROTCE) is the strongest direct driver of bank trading multiples


🔵 But the true causal chain in your data is:

NIM + Efficiency + Credit quality → ROA → ROE → TBV growth → Multiples


🟢 And the market overlay is:

  • Growth (EPS, TBV) determines P/E vs P/TBV premium
  • Risk (NPAs, leverage) determines discount vs premium











Thursday, June 11, 2026

How Banks Make Money: Culture. Not Kidding.

I recently spoke at a banking conference with a session titled: Profit Drill Down-How Banks Make Money. Below is a summary of my comments.

Core Thesis

Banks improve performance when executive-level KPIs are systematically translated (“waterfalled”) down to every level of the organization—so that individual roles, units, products, and customers all align to the same economic drivers. When done well, this creates a self-reinforcing culture—an “invisible hand” guiding behavior without constant top-down pressure.


1. The Problem: Strategy Doesn’t Reach the Front Line

Banks typically track high-level KPIs (e.g., Net Interest Margin, ROE, efficiency ratio). 

But these metrics often don’t translate meaningfully to frontline staff: 

Example: What does a 3.80% NIM target actually mean to a relationship manager?

Without translation, KPIs remain abstract, disconnected, and ineffective as drivers of behavior.


2. Culture as the Missing Link

The presentation defined culture as: 

  1. An“invisible operating system”
  2. An alignment mechanism
  3. A value creation engine 

Strong performance isn’t just about strategy—it’s about embedding that strategy into everyday decisions.


3. The Solution: KPI Waterfalling

The key idea is to decompose bank-level financial outcomes into actionable drivers at every level:

Example Cascades

Net Interest Margin (NIM) → Branch KPIs (deposit mix, deposit spreads (%), deposit spread growth); Lender KPIs (loan spreads (%), loan spread growth) 

Return on Equity (ROE) → Marketing KPIs (campaign ROEs); Lender KPIs (portfolio ROEs); Relationship KPIs (ROE hurdle rates) 

Efficiency Ratio / Expense Control → Support function KPIs (opex/loans serviced), opex/deposits serviced)

Result: Each employee sees how their actions directly affect enterprise outcomes.


4. Extending to Products and Customers

The framework emphasizes profitability at the product and customer level, not just the bank level by understanding: 

  1. Which products generate the most risk-adjusted revenue
  2. Which customers create or destroy value

Banks can allocate effort, pricing, and strategy more effectively.


5. Performance Insight: Variation Matters

Benchmarking across banks shows wide dispersion between top- and bottom-quartile performers. Benchmarking within the bank can also be powerful, i.e. which Lender demonstrated the best improvement in loan spreads among our team of lenders?

Trend compares apples-to-apples: how did the Market Street branch deposit spread improve over time? 

This highlights: 

o Execution—not just strategy—is what differentiates performance

o Proper alignment and accountability can close that gap


6. Cultural Impact: Turning KPIs into Behavior

When KPI waterfalling is done correctly:

Everyone shares the same goals, not just executives

Employees feel: 

  1. Connected to the strategy
  2. Supported rather than policed 

Decision-making becomes: 

  1. Faster. There is greater empowerment, less policing
  2. More consistent
  3. Economically aligned


7. Key Takeaways

Tie strategy → KPIs → compensation → daily activities across all levels

Make KPIs relevant and actionable for each role

Use alignment to create a performance-driven culture without constant oversight

Culture becomes the“invisible hand” that drives sustained improvement 


Bottom Line

The presentation argued that financial performance is not just a function of strategy—it’s a function of alignment.

When banks successfully cascade KPIs from the boardroom to the frontline and down to individual customer decisions, those KPIs stop being metrics and instead become shared goals that shape behavior, ultimately driving superior, consistent performance.


~ Jeff



If you find granular measurements like what was mentioned here as elusive or you lack the resources to do it, please contact me at jeffrey.marsico@wolfandco.com.